bug test_git_update avec git branc réparé

readme.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-## Testing of differeng cloning methods 
+## Testing of different cloning methods 
 Our objective is to find the least-consuming method in terms of memory and bandwidth resources.
 We are interested in cloning one specific state of the repository. We are not interested in its history or the possibility to change it from the server where it has been cloned. The first step is done by the script creation_repo.sh which creates an adequate repository to act as a local remote. The testing in itself is done by performance_tests.sh.
 
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ OPTIONS
     -n number executes test number
     -h prints the help. 
 DESCRIPTION
-    This script is in writing. It allows you to measure memory and bandwidth usage. The first four test different cloning methods. Te following apply changes to the local remote before testing fetching and merging commands.
+    This script allows you to measure memory and bandwidth usage. The first five test different cloning methods. Te following apply changes to the local remote before testing fetching and merging commands.
     TEST0: classic cloning 
     TEST1: --single-branch cloning
     TEST2: --depth=1 --no-single-branch cloning

test_git_update.sh

@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ history_check(){
 tag_check(){
     local repo_name=$1
     cd $repo_name
-    run $(git branch) > res
-    if [ $(grep "no branch" res | wc -l) = 1 ];then
+    git branch > res
+    if [ $(grep "no branch" res | wc -l) = 1 ]; then
         echo "The tag instruction has been respected"
         tag_result=0
     else
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ tag_check(){
 branch_check(){
     local repo_name=$1
     run cd $repo_name
-    run $(git branch) > res
+    git branch > res
     if [ $(grep $BRANCH_NAME res | wc -l) = 1 ];then
         echo "The branch instruction has been respected"
         branch_result=0